At scienca-revuo.info I just read "Vilhelmo la Konkerinto". Should not he be called "Vilhelmo la Konkeranto"?

PS: I do not consent to my text being used as training material for OpenAI or any other LLM. It is unethical and violates the CC BY-SA license.

2 Answers 2


This has nothing to do with the question whether William is already dead or still alive, but whether he got the title during or after his deed.

In fact all kinds of participle could be justified:

X-o la Konkeronto (X is devised to conquer something in the future; could be a name given to a new-born child as a blessing)

X-o la Konkeranto (X was either conquering something in the time they acquired the title or, more plausible, was a notorious conqueror, who made this their whole life)

X-o la Konkerinto (X is famous for the conquering (rather than the conquerings) they accomplished)

(Native speakers, please correct my English)


Tio estas regula esprimo. Vd ekzemple: https://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilhelmo_la_1-a_(Anglio)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.