2

Verbs in subordinate clauses are "conjugated" relatively to the parent clause.

"Li pensis (past) ke si ludas (present, relative to parent clause) bonan muzikon"

But then what if there are nested clause pairs like this?

"Li pensis (past) ke si ludas (present, relative to parent clause) bonan muzikon, sed ĝi resonis tiel ke ĉiuj plantoj ĉirkaŭe forvelkas" (some commas omitted for clarity in separating the two bigger clauses)

This is like ((clause, subordinate), (clause, subordinate)), in a dumbed down syntax tree sense. Is the "resoni" still supposed to be in past tense (absolute, because the root level is in the present), or present tense (relative to the "pensi" in the first big clause)?

  • Off-topic remark: Si cannot be the subject, thus Li pensis ke si ludas should be Li pensis ke li ludas. See explanation in English here (paragraph 59). – Vidamuzo Nov 19 '19 at 13:23
1

There are two main clauses here, "li pensis" and "ĝi resonis", that are made parallel, equal-valued (sorry, I know the term neither in English nor in Esperanto) by the word sed. At least to me the example appears like, that the actions in the main clauses are taking place at the same time, thus I would choose resonis.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.