1

I'm talking about words like Plaĝo (French) & Strando (German) for 'beach' or Razeno & Gazono for 'lawn'. Is there a difference between the words or just personal preference? Maybe I'm the only one bothered by it but filling up the vocabulary with words that are nothing but duplicates seems pointless, & just means more words to learn. Koro & Kero both mean heart although the former seems to be the organ & the latter seems to refer to the playing card.

4

The way I see it, there are mainly four reasons.

The first two: Esperanto is a living language and Esperanto is a diaspora language. Speakers might come up with new roots (and other elements, even preopositions and pronouns) to express new concepts. That accounts for some of the duplications, since people in different places used different roots. Specially at the beginning, when communications were a lot slower, being a disapora language meant you could end up with duplications.

Third: not all speakers agree on how the language should develop. Standarization (I'll say standard for Fundamentaj/oficialaj radikoj) does happen, but it cannot (and it maybe should not) solve duplications.

For some, the language should keep on adding roots to be able to precisely define everything and to provide literature with alternatives. See: La mava lingvo. They do not only wait for it to happen, they actively try to add those roots, with the same meaning of exisiting roots or words.

Others think that the beauty and usefulness of Esperanto is the fact that with relatively few elements, a set of rules and context you can express anything. See: La bona lingvo. This is one of their efforts.

Take for example koro/kero. Check other languages and you will see that "heart" is either the only way to mentions those cards, or an accepted way. So, no need to even learn that root. We cannot demote it, because we all stand by the Fundamento, but you could ignore it and use koro and everybody will understand.

About razeno/gazono, that's another situation since neither is standard. Both mean herbotapiŝo, which you can use instead, or simple herbo as in sur la herbo.

Fourth reason: experts (fakuloj), people that know a lot about their areas of interest. They sometimes feel the language could do better and add roots at providing exact meanings. For a gardener there might be a huge difference between the grass in front of the house and herbo(tapiŝo) and that person might feel the urge to come up with gazono (those words are sometimes just borrowed from the native languages of the experts).

Knowing about the duplicated roots and words is alright. You can decide which ones to use based on your preferences, your language environment or your view of Esperanto. And you will have the standard set of roots there to back you up in case you decide to take the bona lingvo way.

| improve this answer | |
  • An additional point to the third issue above. The idea that the community decides about new roots was perhaps suitable at the end of the 1800 century, but is a too slow process nowadays. To describe new phenomena and things people understandably want words. The standardisation work by AdE and its workgroups is too slow to keep up with the currently required/wanted/expected pace. – Juha Metsäkallas Jun 6 at 15:22
  • @JuhaMetsäkallas, agreed, worth mentioning. Not sure if it's a bad thing though. In a way, standarization puts new roots practically at the level of the Fundamento. I think I'd rather let them take their time and do it right. And somethings just fade away, however important they were at a specific time (smartphones or cellular phones are now simply phones for example). So no hurry. They have to standarize building blocks, not every single root. By the way, the community still decides about roots, it's all about usage as in other living languages. I don't think AdE comes up with new ones. – Eduardo Trápani Jun 6 at 16:03
  • I'd never heard of herbotapiŝo. I'd probably use that, but you still need to know razeno/gazono in case somebody you're talking to uses one of them. I decided to study Esperanto mostly because of the 600 root word thing & that could be even less if the community decided on one word among those duplicate pairs. I know that's easier said than done, but most communication happens online anyway, so that would make it easier. AFAIK plaĝo/strando are simply from different languages. The norwegian word is stranden. Is there anywhere to find out which one is used more among the pairs? – jastako Jun 7 at 6:26
  • You would probably just use "herbo", as everybody has been doing from the beginning, even Zamenhof. "herbotapiŝo" could be an alternative for gardeners, for example, that want to emphasize the fact that it is cultivated and taken care of. Communication does not happen mostly online though, not for everybody. In my case, family usage and congresses and meetings are the main source of usage and interaction. About relative word pairs usage, that's an interesting question. Do you want to ask it? – Eduardo Trápani Jun 7 at 18:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.