Timeline for What is difference between "multo" and "multe"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 2, 2016 at 11:08 | comment | added | Marcos Cramer | @matthewncover Your answer is misleading, as you say that multe is an adverb without explicitly clarifying that as an adverb of quantity, it can also be used in a noun-like way (see my answer). Your last comment also has a mistake: pluvi can never take an object, so "pluvas multon" is wrong. And as clarified in my answer, the grammatically correct sentence "pluvas multo" would probably not be understood as synonymous with "pluvas multe". | |
Oct 28, 2016 at 14:17 | vote | accept | svendvn | ||
Nov 2, 2016 at 16:21 | |||||
Oct 20, 2016 at 8:22 | history | edited | matthewncover | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 41 characters in body
|
Oct 19, 2016 at 23:29 | comment | added | matthewncover | @svendvn I suppose I was being redundant, sorry for the confusion. @ AntoniaMontaro You could get away with "pluvas multon", but "pluvas multe" is more frequent. | |
Oct 19, 2016 at 18:55 | comment | added | Antonia Montaro | Then, is "Pluvas multo" wrong? | |
Oct 19, 2016 at 17:45 | comment | added | svendvn | ah, I think you are right about the lyrics. But it doesn't answer the questions in my comment. | |
Oct 19, 2016 at 11:06 | comment | added | matthewncover | keep in mind, in those instances multe still describes a verb, so the adverb form is best. Also, Jonny M is great. | |
Oct 19, 2016 at 10:00 | comment | added | svendvn | What do you actually mean by makes the most grammatical sense? And is it wrong to use multe as a subject(like I think Jonny M does in "Dankon", singing "multe okazis, multe sukcesis")? | |
Oct 19, 2016 at 3:55 | history | edited | matthewncover | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 143 characters in body
|
Oct 19, 2016 at 3:47 | history | answered | matthewncover | CC BY-SA 3.0 |