Timeline for If you translate "individually" with "unuope", how would you translate "collectively" accordingly?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2017 at 22:15 | comment | added | psychoslave | This appears in an in progress Esperanto translation of documentation about Perligata. There, it is used to refer to curly bracket characters, who don't have much individual opinions, to my mind. Actually, in this specific case, duope is problably even more relevant. But I keep your plurope as a good option for some other context I might accouter, thank you. ;) | |
| Feb 3, 2017 at 22:08 | history | edited | psychoslave | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
No *italic* formating in the title
|
| Feb 3, 2017 at 18:10 | comment | added | Neil Roberts | It might be good to give some examples of your usage of “individually”. I’m not sure whether “unuope” is really a good translation of that word. I think “individually” has a nuance of ignoring everyone else and thinking about oneself. I think “individue” is an accurate translation of that, whereas “unuope” might better be translated as “one by one” or “one at a time”. I think “plurope” could be good as the opposite of “unuope”, and that might be translated as “in groups of several at time” or something along those lines. | |
| Feb 3, 2017 at 17:46 | comment | added | Tomaso Alexander | Note that according to the link for ĉiomope (which was edited into the question above after some of the answers were given) ĉiomope means "as many as you want at a time." This contrasts to the meaning one might expect based on words like kiomope - so it would probably be best to avoid words like ĉiomope to avoid confusion. Usually -ope is used with a number. | |
| Feb 3, 2017 at 8:44 | history | edited | psychoslave | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
others possible translations
|
| Feb 3, 2017 at 8:06 | vote | accept | psychoslave | ||
| Feb 3, 2017 at 8:05 | history | edited | psychoslave | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 409 characters in body
|
| Feb 2, 2017 at 22:22 | answer | added | Tomaso Alexander | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 2, 2017 at 20:07 | history | edited | Andrew Woods | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
format, spelling
|
| Feb 2, 2017 at 16:23 | answer | added | Vincent Oostelbos | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 2, 2017 at 15:07 | history | asked | psychoslave | CC BY-SA 3.0 |