3

I see a lot about Esperanto being really European. Does this mean that Esperanto is really hard for Asian learners?

  • 1
    I think you should be more specific with regard to "Asians" and "Europeans". Russia could be a part of Asia geographically, although linguistically and culturally it is Eastern European. In addition, many Asians such as many Indians speak Indo-European languages natively. Lastly, some Europeans, such as Hungarians, although culturally and geographically European, do not speak Indo-European languages. – TreeHouse196 Sep 2 '16 at 21:25
  • @TreeHouse196 you can edit the question to reflet that – benahm Sep 3 '16 at 20:40
8

This article, "Esperanto as language and idea in China and Japan", seems to imply that it's not particularly hard to learn for non-Western speakers (see comment for full PDF version). In fact, in 1907 Chinese anarchists called for Chinese to be replaced by Eo, which they considered as the more suitable language.

I also do not know any Asian speakers of Eo; but then, living in the UK I do not know many Asians altogether. So it might well be a case of the 'bubble' you live in. Previously I had come across the notion that Chinese people especially liked Eo as it was free of any colonial associations which came with the other European languages.

It still seems to be taken more seriously in China than in most Western countries:

1910s: Esperanto is taught in state schools in the Republic of China, Samos, and Macedonia. (Today it is part of the curriculum of China, Hungary, and Bulgaria.) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Esperanto

Then there is also the question of what it means for a language to be hard. This is generally related to how different a foreign language is to your native one. My native language is German, so I have little difficulty learning English, Dutch, and even Swedish. But Korean, Japanese, and Chinese would be harder for me to learn, as they are very different in phonology, morphology, syntax, etc.

However, by that reasoning Eo should not be any harder to learn for non-Western speakers than any other Western language. On the contrary, due to its regularity it would be easier. Perhaps not as easy as for a native Western language speaker, but still easier for a non-Western language learner than learning English, French, or German.

  • 1
    The article "Esperanto as language and idea in China and Japan" is available here. – Marco Sep 2 '16 at 15:58
  • @Marco Dankon! Tre interesa. – Oliver Mason Sep 2 '16 at 16:06
  • Hm, I've lived my whole life in Bulgaria and haven't heard about Esperanto in the educational system. It may have been in the curriculum in the past but unfortunately I'm almost sure it is not now. Do you have any other reference besides Wikipedia? That would be very interesting. I tried searching in the Bulgarian Wikipedia and Google (in Bulgarian) about that but found absolutely nothing. – Lyubomir Vasilev Sep 3 '16 at 5:48
  • @LyubomirVasilev Sorry, no. Is the curriculum national, or are there regional variations? Perhaps it is in some areas but not others? – Oliver Mason Sep 4 '16 at 11:08
  • @OliverMason I think it's national. Maybe I should try asking someone of the Bulgara Esperanto-Asocio because this is interesting. Unfortunately, I'm still a komencanto and I don't know any of those people… yet. – Lyubomir Vasilev Sep 6 '16 at 20:01
3

"Too hard" is very subjective. As Oliver has already outlined, it is easier to learn Esperanto (for people that speak languages that don't share similarities with Indo-European languages) than it is to learn other Indo-European languages. Here is a very personal account of Zhu Xin (祝昕), who learnt Esperanto in five months. Claude Piron talks of the similarities between Esperanto and Chinese - the isolating qualities - in this article.

So we'd just come back to your definition of what "too hard" means. The vocabulary is mainly from Romance and Germanic languages. Certainly Chinese people that have previously learnt another Indo-European language will find the vocabulary easier to learn than those that haven't.

3

Esperanto should be more difficult for people who speak "non-European" languages, mainly non-romance languages. Generally, Asians had studied English during several years. Even if most of them cannot speak, or even understand English, they had learned the alphabet and many words.

Esperanto is more difficult for them, but not as difficult as if they had never tried to learn another language. If an "European" can learn Esperanto in 2 to 6 months, for an Asian could be nearer to one year.

I have spoken Esperanto in Japan, Korea, China, Vietnam, Hungary. I have not heard any complains, but most of them would say that Esperanto is much, much easier than English.

3

Esperanto might be tremendously easier than say English.

But it is narrowly modeled after European languages. Coincidentally maybe some features fit even better in non-European languages, but starting with the grammar with its article-adverb-adjective-noun-verb-accusative upto expressions "bonkora" = (literally) "goodhearted" it needs quite some abstraction of a non-European.

That narrow adherence can be seen in kio = "what".

Say, what you are thinking = Diru, kion vi pensas (subphrase)
What are you thinking = Kion vi pensas? (question)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.